This text is translated into Russian by google automatic human level neural machine.
EastRussia is not responsible for any mistakes in the translated text. Sorry for the inconvinience.
Please refer to the text in Russian as a source.
A case was brought against the FSUE "Natrbresource" about the violation of the bidding procedure
In respect FSUE "Natrbresource"A case has been initiated under Article 17 of the antimonopoly legislation, said today the head of the regional department of the FAS Sergey Vyalykh. This became known during a press conference in the administration of the Primorsky Territory. “Today, the Primorsky OFAS is considering a case against the National Fisheries resource for holding a competition to conclude an agency agreement. Speech on the management of hydraulic structures on the territory of Primorsky and Kamchatka Territories, Sakhalin and Magadan Regions ”, - said the head of the Federal Antimonopoly Service of Russia for the Primorsky Territory.
At the end of November 2014, seaports applied to the antimonopoly service of the region with a corresponding application. The OFAS of the Krai has analyzed the documentation and filed a case on violation of the antimonopoly legislation under Article 17 concerning the violation of the bidding procedure.
"We saw a violation in that the winner of the auction, and it turned out to be a firm from the Big Stone, did not meet the requirements set forth. And the second firm could not be found at the specified addresses. There is a suspicion that she was a participant for the species. Also, the content analysis showed that, in addition to the agency agreement, the company was still given powers related to the ownership and use of hydraulic structures. Now we are considering this matter. At 14 May scheduled for the next meeting, probably already make a decision ", - Sergey Vyalykh explained.
According to the deputy head of the Federal Antimonopoly Service of Russia Alexander Kinev, the activities of the National Fish Resource cause serious questions at the antitrust service.
"In general, in addition to mooring walls and other port facilities, which are used vaguely by the Federal State Unitary Enterprise, we have made claims to the enterprise that, being an authorized Rosrybolovstvo, it does not transparently conduct competitive procedures, including distribution of quota shares, as well as territorial waters of foreign states. There are a number of other claims ", - said Alexander Kinev.
It is noted that the Federal Antimonopoly Service has already instituted and is investigating several cases against the National Resources Agency.