This text is translated into Russian by google automatic human level neural machine.
EastRussia is not responsible for any mistakes in the translated text. Sorry for the inconvinience.
Please refer to the text in Russian as a source.
"Yakutia is working on projects"
- Mikhail Lvovich, please share how the business perceives the final version of the TACER Law? Is there enough of the preferences that the Law gives for a significant breakthrough?
- I believe that laws designed to stimulate the development of a particular territory should be adapted to specific breakthrough projects. It is for them to adjust the regulatory framework. It's like a question about a chicken and an egg - which is primary: a project or conditions. In my opinion, the project is the primary one. And for projects, different forms of support and preferences can be created. It is very important to see how skillfully the federal agencies and the government as a whole work when selecting projects for the establishment of TOSER. This is the first.
In this regard, I believe that in the TOSER Act, an insufficient role is assigned to the management company of the territory. This company in the logic of the law only provides the conditions for residents. It would be much more effective to create a Far Eastern corporation for the active formation of projects and their development. That is, do not wait, but act, create. For the time it took to promote the law on TACER, such a corporation could prepare projects. And for the management of territories to create subsidiaries together with the regions.
Third, resources for supporting TACER in the sphere of creating facilities and infrastructure for them at the expense of the federal budget for the coming years are very small. The Ministry of Development of the Far East has the opportunity to allocate only 42 billion rubles for three years to support infrastructure facilities for priority investment projects and TSEG. Therefore, it is hoped that not so much this support, and preferences themselves will be attractive for investors.
- Can the initiative to allocate one hectare of land to the Far-Easterners and everyone who wants to live in the Far East bring the result to life?
- The initiative is certainly positive. In itself, the desire to allocate a hectare of land to a person who wants to move to the Far East is highly commendable. It is important that the country's leadership supports it. Take, for example, the Stolypin agrarian reforms of the beginning of the 20th century (1906-1910), when the peasants moved to the free lands of Siberia and the Far East. And it is worth remembering about the role of the credit bank, which sold land to the peasants in debt with a low interest rate on the loan. However, land defaulters were seized. Such tough measures in the course of the reform stimulated the peasants to work actively on it.
Today it is important to understand under what conditions and where the land will be provided. If they tell me that I own a hectare on the moon, I can hardly go there. And what to do with this land - to the extent that, taking into account our vast distances and underdeveloped infrastructure, this measure will work and will attract people in the DFO. It is necessary to avoid unscrupulous buying up of land and concentrating it in one hand, as it happened during the period of privatization in the 1990s, when the vouchers were traded. The direction is quite interesting, but I would like it to be less demagoguery, and more meaningful work. It is important that this work is carried out taking into account the peculiarities of the regions, with the involvement of experts and the general public.
- That is, it is difficult to lure a single person’s land, for example from Central Russia, to the Far East?
- If the task of the same Stolypin project was the development of new lands, the development of peasant farms, now it does not make sense to settle apart from any economic categories. A person will go to where he will earn and where he will have more or less comfortable living conditions that are comparable to the income that he will receive there, and where he will have prospects.
Science has already described the zoning of the Far Eastern territories, where there are more comfortable places for living, there are less comfortable ones. But for the people to live and work there, we need, I repeat, effective projects.
They always went to the Far East to work. There were many romantics, inspired in 1970-ies. The novel by Oleg Kuvaev "Territory." And romance - people enthusiastic (and such were, are and will be) - they are interested in the task that they solve. And again I come back to the word "project": they are people with project thinking who see an image of what they can create (a city or an enterprise), they aim at this and spend a part of their life. The fact that a person sees the result of his work and gets an opportunity to enjoy communication with our great nature, forms the romantic atmosphere of the Far East.
Speaking about attracting new people to the Far East, we must respect the traditions established here and use the invaluable experience that has been formed throughout the history of the region. I was born and raised in Aldan, for many years associated with different regions of my native Yakutia. And I am sure that the human community that has developed here over the centuries is a huge independent value and, at the same time, a powerful resource for the further development of the territory.
- The Law on TOSED says that single-industry towns in three years can receive the status of special development territories. What do you think about it?
- Here, for example, the city of Neryungri in South Yakutia is mainly a city of coal miners. In recent years, the coal market has been unfavorable, which affects the city’s economy. Perhaps today, taking into account exports and the fall of the ruble, the economy will rise slightly. However, dependence on one industry means vulnerability. On behalf of the Government of Yakutia, our corporation is exploring the possibility of locating processing facilities here in the format of industrial parks. The TOSED regime may create additional opportunities for economic diversification.
- Neryungri is perhaps the most popular example when they talk about single-industry towns in Yakutia. And what other cities may be contenders for the establishment of TOSED in them?
- A single-industry city may not experience problems in the economy under one or another market condition. For example, Norilsk is, in fact, a single-industry city, where the town-forming enterprise is Norilsk Nickel, or Surgut, the city of oilmen. If we take by analogy with Neryungri, in the Aldan region of Yakutia there is a settlement of gold miners Nizhny Kuranakh. Today, gold market conditions are good, and therefore this settlement has no serious problems. But in the middle of 1990's. The lower Kuranakh was on the verge of collapse - the price of gold then plummeted. Does this mean that it is necessary to form alternative opportunities for development for this village? Of course! And mineral deposits are not limitless. So you can approach almost any locality, the basis of which is the development of certain minerals. We need to look for options for them in the long term.
- You mentioned two settlements in Yakutia - Neryungri and Aldan - areas where the Corporation of Development of South Yakutia (South Yakutsk Corporation) operates. What event has become a landmark in the activities of the corporation in the last year?
- If we talk about other projects being implemented not only within the framework of the Southern Yakutia Development Corporation, but about the Far Eastern projects in general, how can the crisis affect them? Will the economic situation in the country scare away foreign investors?
- The situation is complex and multifactorial. In my opinion, in these difficult conditions for the Far East there is a chance to get an additional impetus for development. I have already said that in such crisis conditions the position of freezing everything is absolutely unacceptable, it is very important to make quick and correct decisions and concentrate efforts on implementing those projects that can have a positive effect. I believe that the development projects of the Far East in general are just such and can not be postponed. And all this, in the long run, will lead to positive shifts in the structure of the Russian economy and make it more stable.
- What other new projects are being prepared for implementation in the south of Yakutia?
- We plan to start preparation of the timber processing project in the area of the city of Tommot this year. This is the Aldan district. Forestry in the region is underestimated (in Yakutia, anyway), and I believe that it will have a serious development, including with the participation of foreign investors.
- Recently the Yakutia Development Corporation was established. What is this structure and how does it differ from the South Yakut Corporation?
- The main task of the Development Corporation of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia), which was registered in Yakutsk on 22 last December, is the preparation of new projects - the link in the development of the territory that is really weak. There are a lot of different proposals and directions in the region, but there are no projects. By the way, this applies to the entire Far East. Recently Yu. P. Trutnev again spoke about the insufficient development of TOSED projects. The new Corporation will form new projects (and is already working on them) and not just “draw” business plans, but be engaged in development. And the South-Yakut Corporation is, in fact, the project office of a large integrated project. It will join the new development institute.
- If you imagine that all the planned projects will be implemented, what kind of Yakutia you see in twenty years?
In fact, I would like to be sure that people who will live in the region will be happy. They will be interested to live here, they will strive here. Any business begins with an image, some projects, actions, businesses are created from it, which will work for the benefit of people.
If we generally speak about measures to support the development of the Far East, it is important, in my opinion, to understand: there are no simple solutions, no ready-made recipes and analogies. Yakutia is not Primorye, Primorye is not the Khabarovsk Territory and Chukotka, but in general it is not Hong Kong or Singapore. The 21 century is not a 19 or 20. Before us is the most difficult historical challenge, we have to tune in to a hard coordinated work with a high degree of responsibility of everyone. And it is very interesting!
- Visual thinking is typical of romantics. So you are a romantic?
- It turns out that yes.