This text is translated into Russian by google automatic human level neural machine.
EastRussia is not responsible for any mistakes in the translated text. Sorry for the inconvinience.
Please refer to the text in Russian as a source.
The ATP is being replaced by engineering?
Before our eyes, the birth of a new region on the political map of the world - the Indo-Pacific
The Indo-Pacific Region is a vast marine area that includes the Indian and Pacific Oceans, as well as their bordering shores. According to the authors of the idea, the new geographical concept should reflect the growth and interpenetration of the spheres of influence of China and India, as well as a significant increase in sea trade flows, especially energy supplies, between East Asia, South Asia and the Middle East.
Who promotes engineering?
Who might be interested in the Indo-Pacific region? It is noteworthy that today, Australia, India and the United States, as well as Japan, are promoting the most enthusiastic engineers.
India's interest is clear. The self-titled "own" region, of course, flatteres the great-power self-love of Indians and increases the country's prestige. If the affiliation of Delhi to the APR is often disputed, the ITP should no longer leave it in any doubt. The concept of Indo-Pacific legitimizes India's growing strategic interests in East Asia and the Western Pacific.
As for Australia, a country at the junction of the Indian and Pacific Ocean, the new geographic formula gives Canberra a chance to be in the heart of the reformulated APR and get rid of some marginality and periphery of its regional identity. It is the Australian analysts who have shown the greatest activity for the development of the idea of engineering. They also do not hide that one of the goals of the new region is to justify the need to maintain the leading strategic role of Canberra's main ally, Washington, in the Indo-Pacific Asia.
Apparently, the idea of engineers and technicians is close to Japan. Prime Minister Shinzo Abe wants Australia, India, Japan, and the United States to form a “strategic diamond” configuration to ensure the safety of the sea in the Indian Ocean and the western part of Pacifica.
Region-building, that is, the purposeful creation of political regions, is not a rare phenomenon in international relations. You can recall the "Euro-Atlantic" (aka "North Atlantic") - a concept that was designed to ensure the unbreakable unity of the United States and Western Europe. The same APR, which has now received a competitor in the form of engineering and technical personnel, is also a largely artificial entity. As the author of the book “The Asia-Pacific Region: Myths, Illusions, and Reality” rightly points out, Oleg Arin, the narrative about the APR, created in 1970 – 80-s, was largely due to the need for an ideological and political rationale for maintaining and consolidating US dominant positions on Pacific and East Asia. By the way, Russia also does not stand aside from similar regional construction projects to ensure its geopolitical interests. A striking example is the promotion of the geo-concept of Eurasia and the project of the Eurasian Union.
How successful will be the attempt to construct the Indo-Pacific region, time will tell. Obviously, not all this geopolitical construction will be to your liking. First of all, of course, she does not like China.
Beijing - Delhi: a new axis of world politics?
If the Indo-Pacific region nevertheless turns from a fashionable verbal construct into a geopolitical reality, it will determine the state of world politics and economics, and relations between China and India will become its carrier axis.
China with a GDP of $ 12,4 trillion (at purchasing power parity) today yields only to the economic power of the United States. Indicators of India look more modest: its GDP is almost three times inferior to Chinese, accounting for "only" $ 4,7 trillion (4 place in the world). India is still lagging behind the PRC and in terms of economic growth. If China has been demonstrating the growth of 8-10% per year for a long time, then the rate of increment of Indian GDP since the end of 1990-ies was about 7%, and in 2012, it fell to 5,4%.
India, on the contrary, enters the most favorable demographic phase, when the age structure is dominated by people of young and middle age. According to UN experts, by 2030, the population of China will begin to decline, and India will become the most populous country in the world. This is likely to affect the ratio of their economic potentials: the pace of development of China will slow down, and India will begin to rush forward.
It can be confidently predicted that the Delhi-Beijing dyad, along with the Beijing-Washington axis, will act as the most important bilateral relations of world politics of the 21st century. What will happen between the two Asian giants will directly or indirectly touch everyone else. If India and China manage to come to an agreement by forming an "Asian alliance," they can easily claim world hegemony.
The main reason for the growing rivalry between the two Asian Colossi is, perhaps, that they have ceased to be self-sufficient, self-centered civilizations, which they have been for thousands of years, and have become ambitious great powers that actively assert themselves in the international arena. One can only hope that the competition between India and China will have a peaceful and constructive outcome.