This text is translated into Russian by google automatic human level neural machine.
EastRussia is not responsible for any mistakes in the translated text. Sorry for the inconvinience.
Please refer to the text in Russian as a source.
Between Finland and China
Evsei GurvichHead of the Economic Expert Group, member of the Economic Council under the President of the Russian Federation
Evsei Gurvich, Head of the Economic Expert Group, member of the Economic Council under the President of the Russian Federation:
This applies to fish stocks, partly to forestry, etc. The second, intermediate option is the civilized, legal export of primary resources. Everything is done the same, but on a legal and official basis, with the inclusion of regulatory mechanisms. And the third, optimal option is when the process of transition from the export of primary resources to the export of processed products begins step by step. There is nothing unusual here, there are many similar examples in the world. Many countries have successfully followed this path - for example, Finland started out as a timber exporter. Then they had a processing industry, factories that produced paper products. Then they moved on to modern, "advanced" paper production, and in this area they gradually became leaders. Then they began to develop woodworking and produce equipment for this market segment, which also became the best in Europe. And then they focused mainly on the export of high-level products in the woodworking, pulp and paper industries and related equipment.
We have for this strategy two prerequisites - significant reserves of natural resources and the proximity of large, dynamically developing markets. It is clear that this alone is not enough. Not only for the Russian Far East, but also for the whole country, the problem of economic diversification is very acute: increasing the share of processed products in the export structure, reducing dependence on oil and gas exports, etc. Appropriate programs are offered mass, but, as we know, they work not that dynamically and effectively. In the Far East, I think we need to take some new steps, and they should be connected, first of all, with new forms of international cooperation. That is, the best example for us is not the example of the former raw material countries, which nevertheless became developed, but the experience of the same China, which created free economic zones in the east of the country. I think that we should do the same. This will be the third prerequisite and component of a successful development strategy, along with the two that I just mentioned. Free economic zones will make the region especially attractive for foreign investors. Especially from the bordering countries with FEFD, as they can invest in products that interest them in terms of exports. To this, it is necessary to add preferential tax conditions, provision of production with infrastructure, disposal of excessive administrative regulation, which is often simply stifling our business. I hope that Alexander Galushka, appointed by the head of the relevant ministry, will play his role in this - he understands the logic of business. It seems to me that its very purpose is largely symbolic: it is a kind of transition from purely bureaucratic methods of leadership to market and business management. The state realized that at the expense of investing money alone from the treasury in the infrastructure or even in something the region can not be lifted. The main thing the Far East needs is in favorable conditions for the development of its own business.
Read more in an exclusive interview. http://www.eastrussia.ru/region/5/471/